The commentaries raised questions about normativity, human rationality, cognitive architectures, cognitive constraints, and the scope or resource rational analysis (RRA). We respond to these questions and clarify that RRA is a methodological advance that extends the scope of rational modeling to understanding cognitive processes, why they differ between people, why they change over time, and how they could be improved.
| Author(s): | Falk Lieder and Thomas L. Griffiths |
| Journal: | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume: | 43 |
| Year: | 2020 |
| Month: | March |
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
| Project(s): | |
| Bibtex Type: | Article (article) |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X19002012 |
| State: | Published |
| URL: | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19002012 |
| Article Number: | E27 |
| Electronic Archiving: | grant_archive |
| Links: | |
BibTex
@article{LiederGriffiths2020Advancing,
title = {Advancing Rational Analysis to the Algorithmic Level},
journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
abstract = {The commentaries raised questions about normativity, human rationality, cognitive architectures, cognitive constraints, and the scope or resource rational analysis (RRA). We respond to these questions and clarify that RRA is a methodological advance that extends the scope of rational modeling to understanding cognitive processes, why they differ between people, why they change over time, and how they could be improved.},
volume = {43},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
month = mar,
year = {2020},
slug = {lieder2020brainandsci},
author = {Lieder, Falk and Griffiths, Thomas L.},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19002012 },
month_numeric = {3}
}