Back
Local Gaussian Process Regression for Real Time Online Model Learning and Control
Learning in real-time applications, e.g., online approximation of the inverse dynamics model for model-based robot control, requires fast online regression techniques. Inspired by local learning, we propose a method to speed up standard Gaussian Process regression (GPR) with local GP models (LGP). The training data is partitioned in local regions, for each an individual GP model is trained. The prediction for a query point is performed by weighted estimation using nearby local models. Unlike other GP approximations, such as mixtures of experts, we use a distance based measure for partitioning of the data and weighted prediction. The proposed method achieves online learning and prediction in real-time. Comparisons with other nonparametric regression methods show that LGP has higher accuracy than LWPR and close to the performance of standard GPR and nu-SVR.
@inproceedings{5410, title = {Local Gaussian Process Regression for Real Time Online Model Learning and Control}, journal = {Advances in neural information processing systems 21 : 22nd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2008}, booktitle = {Advances in neural information processing systems 21}, abstract = {Learning in real-time applications, e.g., online approximation of the inverse dynamics model for model-based robot control, requires fast online regression techniques. Inspired by local learning, we propose a method to speed up standard Gaussian Process regression (GPR) with local GP models (LGP). The training data is partitioned in local regions, for each an individual GP model is trained. The prediction for a query point is performed by weighted estimation using nearby local models. Unlike other GP approximations, such as mixtures of experts, we use a distance based measure for partitioning of the data and weighted prediction. The proposed method achieves online learning and prediction in real-time. Comparisons with other nonparametric regression methods show that LGP has higher accuracy than LWPR and close to the performance of standard GPR and nu-SVR.}, pages = {1193-1200}, editors = {Koller, D. , D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio, L. Bottou}, publisher = {Curran}, organization = {Max-Planck-Gesellschaft}, school = {Biologische Kybernetik}, address = {Red Hook, NY, USA}, month = jun, year = {2009}, slug = {5410}, author = {Nguyen-Tuong, D. and Seeger, M. and Peters, J.}, month_numeric = {6} }