Rationality Enhancement Article 2023

A Computational Process-Tracing Method for Measuring People’s Planning Strategies and How They Change Over Time

Yash1

One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuouslyrefine its own cognitive strategies. Elucidating the underlying learning and adaptation mechanisms is verydifficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable. One important domain in whichstrategies and mechanisms are studied is planning. To enable researchers to uncover how people learn howto plan, we offer a tutorial introduction to a recently developed process-tracing paradigm along with a newcomputational method for inferring people’s planning strategies and their changes over time from the resultingprocess-tracing data. Our method allows researchers to reveal experience-driven changes in people’s choice ofindividual planning operations, planning strategies, strategy types, and the relative contributions of differentdecision systems. We validate our method on simulated and empirical data. On simulated data, its inferencesabout the strategies and the relative influence of different decision systems are accurate. When evaluated on human data generated using our process-tracing paradigm, our computational method correctly detects theplasticity-enhancing effect of feedback and the effect of the structure of the environment on people’s planningstrategies. Together, these methods can be used to investigate the mechanisms of cognitive plasticity and toelucidate how people acquire complex cognitive skills such as planning and problem-solving. Importantly, ourmethods can also be used to measure individual differences in cognitive plasticity and examine how differenttypes (pedagogical) interventions affect the acquisition of cognitive skills.

Author(s): Yash Raj Jain and Frederick Callaway and Thomas L. Griffiths and Peter Dayan and Ruiqi He and Paul M. Krueger and Falk Lieder
Journal: Behavior Research Methods
Volume: 55
Pages: 20377--2079
Year: 2023
Month: June
Project(s):
Bibtex Type: Article (article)
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5
State: Published
URL: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5.pdf.
Electronic Archiving: grant_archive
Attachments:

BibTex

@article{Jain2021Computational,
  title = {A Computational Process-Tracing Method for Measuring People’s Planning Strategies and How They Change Over Time},
  journal = {Behavior Research Methods},
  abstract = {One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuouslyrefine  its  own  cognitive  strategies.   Elucidating  the  underlying  learning  and  adaptation  mechanisms  is  verydifficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable.  One important domain in whichstrategies  and mechanisms  are  studied  is  planning.   To  enable researchers  to  uncover  how  people learn  howto  plan,  we  offer  a  tutorial  introduction  to  a  recently  developed  process-tracing  paradigm  along  with  a  newcomputational method for inferring people’s planning strategies and their changes over time from the resultingprocess-tracing data.  Our method allows researchers to reveal experience-driven changes in people’s choice ofindividual  planning  operations,  planning  strategies,  strategy  types,  and  the  relative  contributions  of  differentdecision systems.  We validate our method on simulated and empirical data.  On simulated data, its inferencesabout the strategies and the relative influence of different decision systems are accurate.  When evaluated on human  data  generated  using  our  process-tracing  paradigm,  our  computational  method  correctly  detects  theplasticity-enhancing effect of feedback and the effect of the structure of the environment on people’s planningstrategies.   Together,  these methods can be used to investigate the mechanisms of cognitive plasticity and toelucidate how people acquire complex cognitive skills such as planning and problem-solving.  Importantly, ourmethods can also be used to measure individual differences in cognitive plasticity and examine how differenttypes (pedagogical) interventions affect the acquisition of cognitive skills.},
  volume = {55},
  pages = {20377--2079},
  month = jun,
  year = {2023},
  slug = {jain2021computational},
  author = {Jain, Yash Raj and Callaway, Frederick and Griffiths, Thomas L. and Dayan, Peter and He, Ruiqi and Krueger, Paul M. and Lieder, Falk},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5.pdf.},
  month_numeric = {6}
}