Article 2020

Adversarial vulnerabilities of human decision-making

{Adversarial examples are carefully crafted input patterns that are surprisingly poorly classified by artificial and/or natural neural networks. Here we examine adversarial vulnerabilities in the processes responsible for learning and choice in humans. Building upon recent recurrent neural network models of choice processes, we propose a general framework for generating adversarial opponents that can shape the choices of individuals in particular decision-making tasks toward the behavioral patterns desired by the adversary. We show the efficacy of the framework through three experiments involving action selection, response inhibition, and social decision-making. We further investigate the strategy used by the adversary in order to gain insights into the vulnerabilities of human choice. The framework may find applications across behavioral sciences in helping detect and avoid flawed choice.}

Author(s): Dezfouli, A and Nock, R and Dayan, P
Journal: {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}
Volume: 117
Number (issue): 46
Pages: 29221--29228
Year: 2020
Publisher: National Academy of Sciences
Project(s):
Bibtex Type: Article (article)
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016921117
Address: Washington, D.C.
Electronic Archiving: grant_archive

BibTex

@article{item_3262542,
  title = {{Adversarial vulnerabilities of human decision-making}},
  journal = {{Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}},
  abstract = {{Adversarial examples are carefully crafted input patterns that are surprisingly poorly classified by artificial and/or natural neural networks. Here we examine adversarial vulnerabilities in the processes responsible for learning and choice in humans. Building upon recent recurrent neural network models of choice processes, we propose a general framework for generating adversarial opponents that can shape the choices of individuals in particular decision-making tasks toward the behavioral patterns desired by the adversary. We show the efficacy of the framework through three experiments involving action selection, response inhibition, and social decision-making. We further investigate the strategy used by the adversary in order to gain insights into the vulnerabilities of human choice. The framework may find applications across behavioral sciences in helping detect and avoid flawed choice.}},
  volume = {117},
  number = {46},
  pages = {29221--29228},
  publisher = {National Academy of Sciences},
  address = {Washington, D.C.},
  year = {2020},
  slug = {item_3262542},
  author = {Dezfouli, A and Nock, R and Dayan, P}
}